Browse

Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art vs Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art is faster by 1.3 stops (f/1.8 vs f/2.8), letting in more light.
  • Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical goes wider (14mm vs 18mm).
  • Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art reaches further (35mm vs 14mm).
Specification comparison
Spec 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical
Brand Sigma Samyang
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Zoom Prime
Focal length 18-35mm 14mm (wider)
Max aperture f/1.8 (faster) f/2.8
Blades 9 n/a
Groups 12 10
Elements 17 14
Filter mm 72 n/a
Min focus m 0.28 0.28
Max magnification 0.232 n/a

Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art

The first constant f/1.8 zoom for APS-C DSLRs, covering 18-35mm. It is known for sharpness and prime-like speed.

Pros

  • f/1.8 across the range
  • Sharp
  • Popular for video

Cons

  • APS-C only
  • Heavy for APS-C at about 810 g

Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical

Manual-focus rectilinear ultra-wide prime for full-frame DSLRs. It is known for a complex mustache-style distortion that is usually corrected in software.

Pros

  • Very wide 14mm view
  • Sharp in the center
  • f/2.8 for night skies

Cons

  • Manual focus only
  • Complex distortion pattern
  • Bulbous front element, no front filters

More comparisons for Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.