Browse

Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art vs Tokina AT-X 16-28 PRO FX 16-28mm f/2.8

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art is faster by 1.3 stops (f/1.8 vs f/2.8), letting in more light.
  • Tokina AT-X 16-28 PRO FX 16-28mm f/2.8 goes wider (16mm vs 18mm).
  • Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art reaches further (35mm vs 28mm).
Specification comparison
Spec 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art AT-X 16-28 PRO FX 16-28mm f/2.8
Brand Sigma Tokina
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Zoom Wide Zoom
Focal length 18-35mm 16-28mm (wider)
Max aperture f/1.8 (faster) f/2.8
Blades 9 9
Groups 12 13
Elements 17 15
Filter mm 72 n/a
Min focus m 0.28 0.28
Max magnification 0.232 0.19
Format n/a full-frame
Weight g n/a 950
Length mm n/a 133.0
Diameter mm n/a 90.0

Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art

The first constant f/1.8 zoom for APS-C DSLRs, covering 18-35mm. It is known for sharpness and prime-like speed.

Pros

  • f/1.8 across the range
  • Sharp
  • Popular for video

Cons

  • APS-C only
  • Heavy for APS-C at about 810 g

Tokina AT-X 16-28 PRO FX 16-28mm f/2.8

A constant f/2.8 wide zoom for full-frame DSLRs covering 16-28mm. It has a bulbous front element.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8
  • Sharp
  • Robust build

Cons

  • Heavy
  • Bulbous front element

More comparisons for Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.