Browse

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR vs Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR is lighter by 30g.
  • Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR goes wider (16mm vs 24mm).
  • Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR reaches further (120mm vs 35mm).
Specification comparison
Spec AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR
Brand Nikon Nikon
Mount Nikon F Nikon F
Type Wide Zoom Zoom
Focal length 16-35mm (wider) 24-120mm
Max aperture f/4.0 f/4.0
Released 2010 2010
Format full-frame full-frame
Groups 12 13
Af motor SWM SWM
Elements 17 17
Weight g 680.0 (lighter) 710.0
Filter mm 77 77
Length mm 125.0 103.5
Stabilized Yes Yes
Diameter mm 82.5 84.0
Min focus m 0.28 (closer focusing) 0.45
Blades n/a 9
Max magnification n/a 0.24

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

A wide-angle zoom for Nikon FX cameras with vibration reduction and a constant f/4 aperture. It takes standard 77mm filters.

Pros

  • Vibration reduction
  • Constant f/4
  • Accepts filters
  • Sharp

Cons

  • Distortion at 16mm
  • Slower than f/2.8

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR

A constant-f/4 standard zoom for Nikon FX cameras with vibration reduction, popular as a walk-around lens.

Pros

  • Constant f/4
  • Vibration reduction
  • Useful 24-120mm range

Cons

  • Distortion at 24mm
  • Slower than f/2.8

More comparisons for Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.