Browse

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR vs Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD is faster by 0.4 stops (f/3.5 vs f/4.0), letting in more light.
  • Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR goes wider (16mm vs 18mm).
  • Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD reaches further (270mm vs 35mm).
Specification comparison
Spec AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD
Brand Nikon Tamron
Mount Nikon F Nikon F
Type Wide Zoom Zoom
Focal length 16-35mm (wider) 18-270mm
Max aperture f/4.0 f/3.5 (faster)
Released 2010 n/a
Format full-frame aps-c
Groups 12 n/a
Af motor SWM PZD
Elements 17 n/a
Weight g 680.0 n/a
Filter mm 77 62
Length mm 125.0 n/a
Stabilized Yes Yes
Diameter mm 82.5 n/a
Min focus m 0.28 (closer focusing) 0.49

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

A wide-angle zoom for Nikon FX cameras with vibration reduction and a constant f/4 aperture. It takes standard 77mm filters.

Pros

  • Vibration reduction
  • Constant f/4
  • Accepts filters
  • Sharp

Cons

  • Distortion at 16mm
  • Slower than f/2.8

Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD

Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD: an APS-C superzoom lens with a 18-270mm focal length and a maximum aperture of f/3.5-6.3, made for Nikon F mount cameras, with Vibration Compensation and quiet motor-driven autofocus. A high-ratio travel zoom covering wide-angle to telep...

More comparisons for Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.