Browse

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR vs Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Tele-Macro

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR goes wider (24mm vs 70mm).
  • Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Tele-Macro reaches further (300mm vs 120mm).
Specification comparison
Spec AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Tele-Macro
Brand Nikon Tamron
Mount Nikon F Nikon F
Type Zoom Macro
Focal length 24-120mm (wider) 70-300mm
Max aperture f/4.0 f/4.0
Released 2010 n/a
Blades 9 n/a
Format full-frame n/a
Groups 13 n/a
Af motor SWM n/a
Elements 17 n/a
Weight g 710.0 n/a
Filter mm 77 n/a
Length mm 103.5 n/a
Stabilized Yes n/a
Diameter mm 84.0 n/a
Min focus m 0.45 n/a
Max magnification 0.24 n/a

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR

A constant-f/4 standard zoom for Nikon FX cameras with vibration reduction, popular as a walk-around lens.

Pros

  • Constant f/4
  • Vibration reduction
  • Useful 24-120mm range

Cons

  • Distortion at 24mm
  • Slower than f/2.8

Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Tele-Macro

Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Tele-Macro: a macro zoom lens with a 70-300mm focal length and a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6, made for Nikon F mount cameras. It is intended for close-up work with small subjects such as flowers and insects.

More comparisons for Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.