Skip to content
Menu

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR vs Tokina AF 630 60-300mm f/4-5.6

Both are Nikon F lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.

Pick the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR if

  • You want a wider view: 24mm vs 60mm at the wide end
  • You shoot handheld in dim light or video: it has optical image stabilization and the Tokina AF 630 60-300mm f/4-5.6 does not
  • You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 0.45 m vs 2 m
  • You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 9 aperture blades vs 6
  • Our notes say it suits: Travel, events, general FX use

Pick the Tokina AF 630 60-300mm f/4-5.6 if

  • You want the lighter lens to carry: 76 g lighter (634 g vs 710 g)
  • You need more reach: 300mm vs 120mm at the long end

Spec differences

14 differences
Specifications that differ between the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR and the Tokina AF 630 60-300mm f/4-5.6
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR Tokina AF 630 60-300mm f/4-5.6
Brand
Nikon
Tokina
Type
Zoom
Superzoom
Focal length
24-120mm
60-300mm
Weight
710 g
634 g lighter
Length
103.5 mm shorter
111 mm
Diameter
84 mm
70 mm slimmer
Filter thread
77 mm
67 mm
Min focus distance
0.45 m closer
2 m
Max magnification
0.24×
0.25× larger
Aperture blades
9 more blades
6
Optical design
17 elements / 13 groups
13 elements / 9 groups
Autofocus motor
SWM
not listed
Image stabilization
Yes stabilized
No
Released
2010
not listed
3 identical specs hidden: mount, format, max aperture. Show all
Mount
Nikon F both
Format
Full frame both
Max aperture
f/4 both

Our notes

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR

A constant-f/4 standard zoom for Nikon FX cameras with vibration reduction, popular as a walk-around lens.

Pros

  • Constant f/4
  • Vibration reduction
  • Useful 24-120mm range

Cons

  • Distortion at 24mm
  • Slower than f/2.8

Our notes

Tokina AF 630 60-300mm f/4-5.6

More comparisons

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.