Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR vs Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro
Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.
Verdict at a glance
- Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR goes wider (24mm vs 70mm).
- Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro reaches further (300mm vs 120mm).
| Spec | AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR | AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Nikon | Tamron |
| Mount | Nikon F | Nikon F |
| Type | Zoom | Telephoto Zoom |
| Focal length | 24-120mm (wider) | 70-300mm |
| Max aperture | f/4.0 | f/4.0 |
| Released | 2010 | n/a |
| Blades | 9 | n/a |
| Format | full-frame | n/a |
| Groups | 13 | n/a |
| Af motor | SWM | n/a |
| Elements | 17 | n/a |
| Weight g | 710.0 | n/a |
| Filter mm | 77 | 62 |
| Length mm | 103.5 | n/a |
| Stabilized | Yes | n/a |
| Diameter mm | 84.0 | n/a |
| Min focus m | 0.45 (closer focusing) | 0.95 |
| Max magnification | 0.24 | n/a |
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR
A constant-f/4 standard zoom for Nikon FX cameras with vibration reduction, popular as a walk-around lens.
Pros
- Constant f/4
- Vibration reduction
- Useful 24-120mm range
Cons
- Distortion at 24mm
- Slower than f/2.8
Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro
A popular telephoto zoom for Nikon DSLRs with a 62mm filter thread and a macro mode. It has no stabilization.
Pros
- Macro mode
- Compact for its range
- Full-frame coverage
- 62mm filter thread
Cons
- Slow aperture
- No stabilization
- Slower focusing than newer lenses
More comparisons for Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR
- Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR vs Sigma 12-24mm f/4 DG HSM Art
- Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR vs Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Tele-Macro
- Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR vs Tokina AT-X 124 PRO DX 12-24mm f/4
- Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR vs Vivitar 75-205mm f/3.8 Auto Tele-Zoom