Browse

Olympus OM Zuiko Auto-Zoom 65-200mm f/4 vs Tamron 35-210mm f/4.2 Adaptall-2

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Tamron 35-210mm f/4.2 Adaptall-2 goes wider (35mm vs 65mm).
  • Tamron 35-210mm f/4.2 Adaptall-2 reaches further (210mm vs 200mm).
Specification comparison
Spec OM Zuiko Auto-Zoom 65-200mm f/4 35-210mm f/4.2 Adaptall-2
Brand Olympus Tamron
Mount Olympus OM Olympus OM
Type Zoom Superzoom
Focal length 65-200mm 35-210mm (wider)
Max aperture f/4.0 (faster) f/4.2
Format full-frame n/a
Groups 11 n/a
Af motor none n/a
Elements 14 n/a
Weight g 730 n/a
Filter mm 55 n/a
Length mm 147.0 n/a
Diameter mm 71.0 n/a
Min focus m 1.2 n/a

Olympus OM Zuiko Auto-Zoom 65-200mm f/4

The Olympus OM Zuiko Auto-Zoom 65-200mm f/4 is a manual-focus short-telephoto zoom lens covering 65-200mm at f/4 for Olympus OM mount cameras. A classic compact manual-focus lens from the Olympus OM film-camera system.

Tamron 35-210mm f/4.2 Adaptall-2

The Tamron 35-210mm f/4.2 Adaptall-2 is a manual-focus superzoom lens covering 35-210mm at f/4.2 for Olympus OM mount cameras. The wide-to-tele range makes it a one-lens option for travel and everyday shooting.

More comparisons for Olympus OM Zuiko Auto-Zoom 65-200mm f/4

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.