Browse

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II vs Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM goes wider (17mm vs 70mm).
  • Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II reaches further (200mm vs 70mm).
Specification comparison
Spec AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM
Brand Nikon Sigma
Mount Nikon F Nikon F
Type Telephoto Zoom Macro
Focal length 70-200mm 17-70mm (wider)
Max aperture f/2.8 f/2.8
Filter mm 77 n/a
Stabilized Yes n/a
Min focus m 1.4 n/a

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II

The second-generation 70-200mm f/2.8 pro telephoto for Nikon FX cameras, with vibration reduction and a silent-wave motor.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8
  • Vibration reduction
  • Sharp

Cons

  • Heavy (about 1.5 kg)
  • Focus breathing at close range
  • Larger than the f/4

Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM

Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM: an APS-C macro zoom lens with a 17-70mm focal length and a maximum aperture of f/2.8-4, made for Nikon F mount cameras, with Optical Stabilizer and Hyper Sonic Motor autofocus. It is intended for close-up work with small subjects such as ...

More comparisons for Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.