Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED vs Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro
Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.
Verdict at a glance
- Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro is lighter by 25g.
| Spec | AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED | 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Nikon | Sigma |
| Mount | Nikon F | Nikon F |
| Type | Prime | Macro |
| Focal length | 105mm | 105mm |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Released | 2006 | n/a |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Groups | 12 | 11 |
| Af motor | SWM | HSM |
| Elements | 14 | 16 |
| Weight g | 750.0 | 725 (lighter) |
| Filter mm | 62 | 62 |
| Length mm | 116.0 | 126.4 |
| Stabilized | Yes | Yes |
| Diameter mm | 83.0 | 78.3 |
| Min focus m | 0.314 | 0.312 |
| Max magnification | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Blades | n/a | 9 |
Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED
A 1:1 macro lens for Nikon FX cameras with vibration reduction. It doubles as a medium-telephoto portrait lens.
Pros
- True 1:1 macro
- Vibration reduction
- Internal focusing
- Sharp
Cons
- Focus breathing
- Larger and heavier than the 60mm (750 g)
- Slow focus at close range
Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro
A stabilized 1:1 macro for full-frame DSLRs that works equally well as a portrait lens. It weighs about 725 g and has a 62mm filter size.
Pros
- True 1:1 magnification
- Optical stabilization
- HSM autofocus
- 62mm filters
Cons
- Older EX design
- Heavier than non-stabilized macro lenses
More comparisons for Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED
- Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED vs Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro
- Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED vs Sigma 105mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art
- Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED vs Vivitar 105mm f/2.5 Auto
- Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED vs Laowa 105mm f/2 STF