Browse

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 120-300mm F2.8E FL ED SR VR vs Tokina AT-X 535 PRO DX 50-135mm f/2.8

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Tokina AT-X 535 PRO DX 50-135mm f/2.8 is lighter by 2405g.
  • Tokina AT-X 535 PRO DX 50-135mm f/2.8 goes wider (50mm vs 120mm).
  • Nikon AF-S Nikkor 120-300mm F2.8E FL ED SR VR reaches further (300mm vs 135mm).
Specification comparison
Spec AF-S Nikkor 120-300mm F2.8E FL ED SR VR AT-X 535 PRO DX 50-135mm f/2.8
Brand Nikon Tokina
Mount Nikon F Nikon F
Type Telephoto Zoom Zoom
Focal length 120-300mm 50-135mm (wider)
Max aperture f/2.8 f/2.8
Released 2020 n/a
Format full-frame aps-c
Groups 19 14
Af motor SWM n/a
Elements 25 18
Weight g 3250.0 845 (lighter)
Filter mm 112 67
Length mm 303.5 135.0
Stabilized Yes n/a
Diameter mm 128.0 78.0
Min focus m 2.0 1.0 (closer focusing)
Blades n/a 9
Max magnification n/a 0.17

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 120-300mm F2.8E FL ED SR VR

A 2020 telephoto zoom with a constant f/2.8 aperture, fluorite and SR elements and VR. It weighs about 3.25kg and takes 112mm filters.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8
  • VR
  • Weather-sealed build
  • Fluorite and SR elements

Cons

  • Heavy at 3.25kg
  • Large 112mm filter size
  • Minimum focus of 2m

Tokina AT-X 535 PRO DX 50-135mm f/2.8

A short telephoto zoom for APS-C DSLRs with a constant f/2.8 aperture. It weighs about 845 g, takes 67mm filters and focuses as close as 1.0 m.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8
  • 67mm filters
  • Good reach for portraits

Cons

  • APS-C only
  • No stabilization
  • Heavy for its range

More comparisons for Nikon AF-S Nikkor 120-300mm F2.8E FL ED SR VR

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.