Browse

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm f/2.8 lens vs Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm f/2.8 lens is faster by 1.7 stops (f/2.8 vs f/5.0), letting in more light.
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm f/2.8 lens is lighter by 1049g.
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm f/2.8 lens goes wider (17mm vs 100mm).
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS reaches further (400mm vs 17mm).
Specification comparison
Spec M.Zuiko Digital 17mm f/2.8 lens M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS
Brand Olympus Olympus
Mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Type Prime Telephoto Zoom
Focal length 17mm (wider) 100-400mm
Max aperture f/2.8 (faster) f/5.0
Weight g 71 (lighter) 1120
Filter mm 37 72
Length mm 22.0 206.0
Diameter mm 57.0 86.0
Min focus m 0.2 0.17 (closer focusing)
Stabilized n/a Yes

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm f/2.8 lens

A pancake 34mm-equivalent prime for Micro Four Thirds. It weighs about 71 g and is 22 mm long.

Pros

  • Tiny at 71 g
  • Pancake size
  • Close focus 0.2 m

Cons

  • f/2.8 is not fast
  • Slow autofocus by current standards
  • Not weather sealed

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS

A stabilized 200-800mm-equivalent super-telephoto zoom for Micro Four Thirds. It weighs about 1,120 g and takes 72mm filters.

Pros

  • Huge 800mm equivalent reach
  • Lens stabilization with Sync IS
  • Dust and splash resistant
  • Teleconverter use is possible

Cons

  • Slow aperture
  • Heavy at about 1,120 g
  • Soft at the long end wide open

More comparisons for Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm f/2.8 lens

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.