Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM vs Tamron E 28-75mm F2.8-2.8
Both are Sony E lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM if
- You want a wider view: 16mm vs 28mm at the wide end
- Our notes say it suits: Landscape and astro, architecture, wedding and event wide shots
Pick the Tamron E 28-75mm F2.8-2.8 if
- You want the lighter lens to carry: 130 g lighter (550 g vs 680 g)
- You need more reach: 75mm vs 35mm at the long end
- You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 0.19 m vs 0.28 m
- You want bigger close-ups: 0.35× vs 0.19× maximum magnification
- You prefer a newer design: released 2018 vs 2017
- Our notes say it suits: Everyday and travel, casual events, video
Spec differences
14 differences| Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM | Tamron E 28-75mm F2.8-2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
Sony
|
Tamron
|
| Type |
Wide Zoom
|
Zoom
|
| Focal length |
16-35mm
|
28-75mm
|
| Weight |
680 g
|
550 g
lighter
|
| Length |
121.6 mm
|
117.8 mm
shorter
|
| Diameter |
88.5 mm
|
73 mm
slimmer
|
| Filter thread |
82 mm
|
67 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
0.28 m
|
0.19 m
closer
|
| Max magnification |
0.19×
|
0.35×
larger
|
| Aperture blades |
not listed
|
9
|
| Optical design |
not listed
|
15 elements / 12 groups
|
| Autofocus motor |
not listed
|
RXD
|
| Weather sealing |
not listed
|
Yes
|
| Released |
2017
|
2018
|
4 identical specs hidden: mount, format, max aperture, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Sony E both
- Format
- Full frame both
- Max aperture
- f/2.8 both
- Image stabilization
- No both
Our notes
Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM
Sony's first f/2.8 ultra-wide zoom for full-frame E-mount, covering 16-35mm at a constant aperture. It takes 82mm front filters.
Pros
- Constant f/2.8 aperture
- 82mm screw-in filter thread
- Dust and moisture resistant design
Cons
- Weighs about 680 g, heavier than the GM II
- No stabilization in the lens
Our notes
Tamron E 28-75mm F2.8-2.8
Tamron's compact 28-75mm f/2.8 standard zoom for Sony full-frame mirrorless. It is lighter than Sony's own f/2.8 zooms.
Pros
- Constant f/2.8
- Light and small
- Covers a useful standard range
Cons
- Starts at 28mm
- No built-in stabilization
More comparisons
Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM vs Tamron 11-20mm F/2.8 Di III-A RXD
more reach (35mm) vs 345 g lighter
Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM vs Tamron E 28-75mm F2.8-2.8
wider (24mm) vs 336 g lighter
Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM vs Tamron 17-70mm F/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
wider (16mm) vs 155 g lighter
Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM vs Sigma 10-18mm F2.8 DC DN | Contemporary 023
more reach (35mm) vs 425 g lighter
Sigma 16-28mm F2.8 DG DN | Contemporary 022 vs Tamron E 28-75mm F2.8-2.8
100 g lighter vs more reach (75mm)
Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM vs Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 DG DN | Art 019
115 g lighter vs wider (14mm)