Browse

Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM vs Tamron 17-70mm F/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM goes wider (16mm vs 17mm).
  • Tamron 17-70mm F/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD reaches further (70mm vs 35mm).
Specification comparison
Spec FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM 17-70mm F/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Brand Sony Tamron
Mount Sony E Sony E
Type Wide Zoom Zoom
Focal length 16-35mm (wider) 17-70mm
Max aperture f/2.8 f/2.8
Released 2017 n/a
Format full-frame n/a
Weight g 680.0 n/a
Filter mm 82 n/a
Length mm 121.6 n/a
Diameter mm 88.5 n/a
Min focus m 0.28 n/a
Max magnification 0.19 n/a

Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM

Sony's first f/2.8 ultra-wide zoom for full-frame E-mount, covering 16-35mm at a constant aperture. It takes 82mm front filters.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8 aperture
  • 82mm screw-in filter thread
  • Dust and moisture resistant design

Cons

  • Weighs about 680 g, heavier than the GM II
  • No stabilization in the lens

Tamron 17-70mm F/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

An APS-C standard zoom for Sony E that keeps f/2.8 across 17-70mm and adds VC stabilization. It uses an RXD focus motor.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8 with VC stabilization
  • Wide 17-70mm range
  • Quiet RXD focus

Cons

  • APS-C only
  • Larger than a kit zoom

More comparisons for Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.