Skip to content
Menu

Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM vs Tamron 12-20mm f/2.8

Both are Sony E wide zoom lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.

Pick the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM if

  • You need more reach: 35mm vs 20mm at the long end
  • Our notes say it suits: Landscape and astro, architecture, wedding and event wide shots

Pick the Tamron 12-20mm f/2.8 if

  • You want the lighter lens to carry: 110 g lighter (570 g vs 680 g)
  • You want a wider view: 12mm vs 16mm at the wide end
  • You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 0.18 m vs 0.28 m
  • You prefer a newer design: released 2026 vs 2017

Spec differences

12 differences
Specifications that differ between the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM and the Tamron 12-20mm f/2.8
Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM Tamron 12-20mm f/2.8
Brand
Sony
Tamron
Focal length
16-35mm
12-20mm
Weight
680 g
570 g lighter
Length
121.6 mm
119.3 mm
Diameter
88.5 mm
90 mm
Filter thread
82 mm
not listed
Min focus distance
0.28 m
0.18 m closer
Max magnification
0.19× larger
0.17×
Aperture blades
not listed
12
Optical design
not listed
17 elements / 12 groups
Weather sealing
not listed
Yes
Released
2017
2026
5 identical specs hidden: mount, type, format, max aperture, image stabilization. Show all
Mount
Sony E both
Type
Wide Zoom both
Format
Full frame both
Max aperture
f/2.8 both
Image stabilization
No both

Our notes

Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM

Sony's first f/2.8 ultra-wide zoom for full-frame E-mount, covering 16-35mm at a constant aperture. It takes 82mm front filters.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8 aperture
  • 82mm screw-in filter thread
  • Dust and moisture resistant design

Cons

  • Weighs about 680 g, heavier than the GM II
  • No stabilization in the lens

Our notes

Tamron 12-20mm f/2.8

More comparisons

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.