TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM
Both are Leica M prime lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the TTArtisan 35mm f/2 if
Our spec data shows no clear advantage for this lens.
Pick the Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM if
- You need 1 stop more light for low light or background blur (f/1.4 vs f/2)
- You want the lighter lens to carry: 129 g lighter (381 g vs 510 g)
Spec differences
9 differences| TTArtisan 35mm f/2 | Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
TTArtisan
|
Zeiss
|
| Max aperture |
f/2
|
f/1.4
1 stop faster
|
| Weight |
510 g
|
381 g
lighter
|
| Length |
not listed
|
65 mm
|
| Filter thread |
52 mm
|
49 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
not listed
|
0.7 m
|
| Max magnification |
not listed
|
0.06×
|
| Aperture blades |
10
|
not listed
|
| Optical design |
12 elements / 9 groups
|
10 elements / 7 groups
|
6 identical specs hidden: mount, type, format, focal length, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Leica M both
- Type
- Prime both
- Format
- Full frame both
- Focal length
- 35mm both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM
Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM: 270 g lighter
Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM vs Voigtlander Nokton Classic 35mm F1.4 II
Voigtlander Nokton Classic 35mm F1.4 II: 192 g lighter, shorter
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 35mm F2 Aspherical
Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 35mm F2 Aspherical: 206 g lighter, more blades
Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM vs Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 35mm F1.5 Aspherical
Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 35mm F1.5 Aspherical: 193 g lighter, focuses closer
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical
Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical: 340 g lighter
7artisans 35mm f/1.7 vs Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM
Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM: ½ stop faster