TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical
Both are Leica M prime lenses. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the TTArtisan 35mm f/2 if
Our spec data shows no clear advantage for this lens.
Pick the Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical if
- You want the lighter lens to carry: 340 g lighter (170 g vs 510 g)
Spec differences
8 differences| TTArtisan 35mm f/2 | Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
TTArtisan
|
Voigtlander
|
| Format |
Full frame
|
not listed
|
| Weight |
510 g
|
170 g
lighter
|
| Length |
not listed
|
28.1 mm
|
| Diameter |
not listed
|
52 mm
|
| Filter thread |
52 mm
|
39 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
not listed
|
0.58 m
|
| Optical design |
12 elements / 9 groups
|
8 elements / 5 groups
|
7 identical specs hidden: mount, type, focal length, max aperture, aperture blades, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Leica M both
- Type
- Prime both
- Focal length
- 35mm both
- Max aperture
- f/2 both
- Aperture blades
- 10 both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM
Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM: 270 g lighter
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 35mm F2 Aspherical
Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 35mm F2 Aspherical: 206 g lighter, more blades
Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM vs Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical
Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical: 70 g lighter, focuses closer
7artisans 35mm f/1.7 vs Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical
7artisans 35mm f/1.7: ½ stop faster
7artisans 35mm f/1.7 vs TTArtisan 35mm f/2
7artisans 35mm f/1.7: ½ stop faster
Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM vs Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical
1 stop faster vs 211 g lighter