Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM vs Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical
Both are Leica M prime lenses. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM if
Our spec data shows no clear advantage for this lens.
Pick the Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical if
- You want the lighter lens to carry: 70 g lighter (170 g vs 240 g)
- You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 0.58 m vs 0.7 m
- You want a compact lens: 28.1 mm vs 56 mm long
Spec differences
10 differences| Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM | Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
Zeiss
|
Voigtlander
|
| Format |
Full frame
|
not listed
|
| Weight |
240 g
|
170 g
lighter
|
| Length |
56 mm
|
28.1 mm
shorter
|
| Diameter |
not listed
|
52 mm
|
| Filter thread |
43 mm
|
39 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
0.7 m
|
0.58 m
closer
|
| Max magnification |
0.06×
|
not listed
|
| Aperture blades |
not listed
|
10
|
| Optical design |
9 elements / 6 groups
|
8 elements / 5 groups
|
6 identical specs hidden: mount, type, focal length, max aperture, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Leica M both
- Type
- Prime both
- Focal length
- 35mm both
- Max aperture
- f/2 both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM
Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM: 270 g lighter
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical
Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical: 340 g lighter
Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 35mm F2 Aspherical
64 g lighter vs focuses closer
7artisans 35mm f/1.7 vs Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical
7artisans 35mm f/1.7: ½ stop faster
7artisans 35mm f/1.7 vs Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM
7artisans 35mm f/1.7: ½ stop faster
Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM vs Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical
1 stop faster vs 211 g lighter