TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Voigtlander Nokton 35mm F1.2 Aspherical IV
Both are Leica M prime lenses. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the TTArtisan 35mm f/2 if
Our spec data shows no clear advantage for this lens.
Pick the Voigtlander Nokton 35mm F1.2 Aspherical IV if
- You need 1½ stops more light for low light or background blur (f/1.2 vs f/2)
- You want the lighter lens to carry: 210 g lighter (300 g vs 510 g)
- You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 12 aperture blades vs 10
Spec differences
9 differences| TTArtisan 35mm f/2 | Voigtlander Nokton 35mm F1.2 Aspherical IV | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
TTArtisan
|
Voigtlander
|
| Format |
Full frame
|
not listed
|
| Max aperture |
f/2
|
f/1.2
1½ stops faster
|
| Weight |
510 g
|
300 g
lighter
|
| Length |
not listed
|
51.8 mm
|
| Diameter |
not listed
|
61.8 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
not listed
|
0.5 m
|
| Aperture blades |
10
|
12
more blades
|
| Optical design |
12 elements / 9 groups
|
9 elements / 7 groups
|
6 identical specs hidden: mount, type, focal length, filter thread, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Leica M both
- Type
- Prime both
- Focal length
- 35mm both
- Filter thread
- 52 mm both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM
Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM: 270 g lighter
Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM vs Voigtlander Nokton 35mm F1.2 Aspherical IV
Voigtlander Nokton 35mm F1.2 Aspherical IV: ½ stop faster, 81 g lighter
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 35mm F2 Aspherical
Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 35mm F2 Aspherical: 206 g lighter, more blades
7artisans 35mm f/1.7 vs Voigtlander Nokton 35mm F1.2 Aspherical IV
Voigtlander Nokton 35mm F1.2 Aspherical IV: 1 stop faster
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical
Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical: 340 g lighter
7artisans 35mm f/1.7 vs TTArtisan 35mm f/2
7artisans 35mm f/1.7: ½ stop faster