TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1 Aspherical
Both are Leica M prime lenses. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 if
- You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 0.7 m vs 0.9 m
- You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 14 aperture blades vs 12
Pick the Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1 Aspherical if
- You want the lighter lens to carry: 203 g lighter (484 g vs 687 g)
Spec differences
9 differences| TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 | Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1 Aspherical | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
TTArtisan
|
Voigtlander
|
| Format |
Full frame
|
not listed
|
| Max aperture |
f/0.95
|
f/1
|
| Weight |
687 g
|
484 g
lighter
|
| Length |
not listed
|
55 mm
|
| Diameter |
not listed
|
73.6 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
0.7 m
closer
|
0.9 m
|
| Aperture blades |
14
more blades
|
12
|
| Optical design |
11 elements / 8 groups
|
9 elements / 7 groups
|
6 identical specs hidden: mount, type, focal length, filter thread, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Leica M both
- Type
- Prime both
- Focal length
- 50mm both
- Filter thread
- 62 mm both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1.2 Aspherical II
⅔ stop faster vs 365 g lighter
TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 vs Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1 Aspherical
55 g lighter vs 1 stop faster
TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Zeiss C Sonnar T* 50mm f/1.5 ZM
1⅓ stops faster vs 437 g lighter
Zeiss C Sonnar T* 50mm f/1.5 ZM vs Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1 Aspherical
234 g lighter vs 1⅓ stops faster
TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Zeiss Planar T* 50mm f/2 ZM
2 stops faster vs 457 g lighter
Zeiss Planar T* 50mm f/2 ZM vs Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1 Aspherical
254 g lighter vs 2 stops faster