TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1.2 Aspherical II
Both are Leica M prime lenses. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 if
- You need ⅔ stop more light for low light or background blur (f/0.95 vs f/1.2)
- You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 14 aperture blades vs 12
Pick the Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1.2 Aspherical II if
- You want the lighter lens to carry: 365 g lighter (322 g vs 687 g)
Spec differences
9 differences| TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 | Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1.2 Aspherical II | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
TTArtisan
|
Voigtlander
|
| Format |
Full frame
|
not listed
|
| Max aperture |
f/0.95
⅔ stop faster
|
f/1.2
|
| Weight |
687 g
|
322 g
lighter
|
| Length |
not listed
|
50.4 mm
|
| Diameter |
not listed
|
63.3 mm
|
| Filter thread |
62 mm
|
52 mm
|
| Aperture blades |
14
more blades
|
12
|
| Optical design |
11 elements / 8 groups
|
8 elements / 6 groups
|
6 identical specs hidden: mount, type, focal length, min focus distance, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Leica M both
- Type
- Prime both
- Focal length
- 50mm both
- Min focus distance
- 0.7 m both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1 Aspherical
focuses closer vs 203 g lighter
TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 vs Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1.2 Aspherical II
Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1.2 Aspherical II: ½ stop faster, 107 g lighter
TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Zeiss C Sonnar T* 50mm f/1.5 ZM
1⅓ stops faster vs 437 g lighter
Zeiss C Sonnar T* 50mm f/1.5 ZM vs Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1.2 Aspherical II
72 g lighter vs ⅔ stop faster
TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Zeiss Planar T* 50mm f/2 ZM
2 stops faster vs 457 g lighter
Zeiss Planar T* 50mm f/2 ZM vs Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1.2 Aspherical II
92 g lighter vs 1½ stops faster