Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary vs Tamron 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD
Both are Nikon Z superzoom lenses for APS-C. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary if
- You want a wider view: 16mm vs 18mm at the wide end
- You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 9 aperture blades vs 7
Pick the Tamron 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD if
Our spec data shows no clear advantage for this lens.
Spec differences
9 differences| Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary | Tamron 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
Sigma
|
Tamron
|
| Focal length |
16-300mm
|
18-300mm
|
| Weight |
630 g
|
not listed
|
| Length |
125.4 mm
|
not listed
|
| Diameter |
73.8 mm
|
75.5 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
not listed
|
0.15 m
|
| Aperture blades |
9
more blades
|
7
|
| Optical design |
20 elements / 14 groups
|
19 elements / 15 groups
|
| Autofocus motor |
Linear motor
|
VXD
|
9 identical specs hidden: mount, type, format, max aperture, filter thread, max magnification, image stabilization, weather sealing, released. Show all
- Mount
- Nikon Z both
- Type
- Superzoom both
- Format
- APS-C both
- Max aperture
- f/3.5 both
- Filter thread
- 67 mm both
- Max magnification
- 0.5× both
- Image stabilization
- Yes both
- Weather sealing
- Yes both
- Released
- 2025 both
More comparisons
Nikon Nikkor Z DX 16-50mm F3.5-6.3 VR vs Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary
495 g lighter vs more reach (300mm)
Nikon Nikkor Z DX 16-50mm F3.5-6.3 VR vs Tamron 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD
wider (16mm) vs more reach (300mm)
Nikon Nikkor Z 14-30mm F4 S vs Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary
145 g lighter vs ⅓ stop faster
Nikon Nikkor Z 14-30mm F4 S vs Tamron 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD
wider (14mm) vs ⅓ stop faster

Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary vs Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD
⅔ stop faster vs 50 g lighter
Tamron E 35-150mm f/2-2.8 2.0-2.8 Di III VXD A058Z vs Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary
1⅔ stops faster vs 560 g lighter