Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM vs Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM
Both are Leica M prime lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM if
- You need 1 stop more light for low light or background blur (f/1.4 vs f/2)
Pick the Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM if
- You want the lighter lens to carry: 141 g lighter (240 g vs 381 g)
Spec differences
5 differences| Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM | Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM | |
|---|---|---|
| Max aperture |
f/1.4
1 stop faster
|
f/2
|
| Weight |
381 g
|
240 g
lighter
|
| Length |
65 mm
|
56 mm
shorter
|
| Filter thread |
49 mm
|
43 mm
|
| Optical design |
10 elements / 7 groups
|
9 elements / 6 groups
|
9 identical specs hidden: brand, mount, type, format, focal length, min focus distance, max magnification, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Brand
- Zeiss both
- Mount
- Leica M both
- Type
- Prime both
- Format
- Full frame both
- Focal length
- 35mm both
- Min focus distance
- 0.7 m both
- Max magnification
- 0.06× both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM vs Voigtlander Nokton Classic 35mm F1.4 II
Voigtlander Nokton Classic 35mm F1.4 II: 192 g lighter, shorter
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM
Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM: 270 g lighter
Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM vs Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 35mm F1.5 Aspherical
Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 35mm F1.5 Aspherical: 193 g lighter, focuses closer
Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 35mm F2 Aspherical
64 g lighter vs focuses closer
7artisans 35mm f/1.7 vs Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM
Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM: ½ stop faster
Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM vs Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical
Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical: 70 g lighter, focuses closer