Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM vs C Biogon T* 35mm f/2.8 ZM
Both are Leica M prime lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM if
- You need 1 stop more light for low light or background blur (f/2 vs f/2.8)
Pick the C Biogon T* 35mm f/2.8 ZM if
- You want the lighter lens to carry: 40 g lighter (200 g vs 240 g)
Spec differences
4 differences| Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM | C Biogon T* 35mm f/2.8 ZM | |
|---|---|---|
| Max aperture |
f/2
1 stop faster
|
f/2.8
|
| Weight |
240 g
|
200 g
lighter
|
| Length |
56 mm
|
55 mm
|
| Optical design |
9 elements / 6 groups
|
7 elements / 5 groups
|
10 identical specs hidden: brand, mount, type, format, focal length, filter thread, min focus distance, max magnification, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Brand
- Zeiss both
- Mount
- Leica M both
- Type
- Prime both
- Format
- Full frame both
- Focal length
- 35mm both
- Filter thread
- 43 mm both
- Min focus distance
- 0.7 m both
- Max magnification
- 0.06× both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM
Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM: 270 g lighter
7artisans 35mm f/2.8 vs Zeiss C Biogon T* 35mm f/2.8 ZM
Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 35mm F2 Aspherical
64 g lighter vs focuses closer
Zeiss C Biogon T* 35mm f/2.8 ZM vs Voigtlander Color-Skopar 35mm F2.5 P II
Voigtlander Color-Skopar 35mm F2.5 P II: ⅓ stop faster, 66 g lighter
Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM vs Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical
Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical: 70 g lighter, focuses closer
Zeiss C Biogon T* 35mm f/2.8 ZM vs Voigtlander Color-Skopar 35mm F2.5 Skopar 100th Model-
Voigtlander Color-Skopar 35mm F2.5 Skopar 100th Model-: ⅓ stop faster, 66 g lighter