Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM vs Voigtlander Color-Skopar 35mm F2.5 P II
Both are Leica M prime lenses. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM if
- You need ⅔ stop more light for low light or background blur (f/2 vs f/2.5)
Pick the Voigtlander Color-Skopar 35mm F2.5 P II if
- You want the lighter lens to carry: 106 g lighter (134 g vs 240 g)
- You want a compact lens: 23 mm vs 56 mm long
Spec differences
10 differences| Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM | Voigtlander Color-Skopar 35mm F2.5 P II | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
Zeiss
|
Voigtlander
|
| Format |
Full frame
|
not listed
|
| Max aperture |
f/2
⅔ stop faster
|
f/2.5
|
| Weight |
240 g
|
134 g
lighter
|
| Length |
56 mm
|
23 mm
shorter
|
| Diameter |
not listed
|
55 mm
|
| Filter thread |
43 mm
|
39 mm
|
| Max magnification |
0.06×
|
not listed
|
| Aperture blades |
not listed
|
10
|
| Optical design |
9 elements / 6 groups
|
7 elements / 5 groups
|
6 identical specs hidden: mount, type, focal length, min focus distance, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Leica M both
- Type
- Prime both
- Focal length
- 35mm both
- Min focus distance
- 0.7 m both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM
Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM: 270 g lighter
7artisans 35mm f/2.8 vs Voigtlander Color-Skopar 35mm F2.5 P II
Voigtlander Color-Skopar 35mm F2.5 P II: ⅓ stop faster
Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 35mm F2 Aspherical
64 g lighter vs focuses closer
Zeiss C Biogon T* 35mm f/2.8 ZM vs Voigtlander Color-Skopar 35mm F2.5 P II
Voigtlander Color-Skopar 35mm F2.5 P II: ⅓ stop faster, 66 g lighter
Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM vs Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical
Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical: 70 g lighter, focuses closer
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Voigtlander Color-Skopar 35mm F2.5 P II
⅔ stop faster vs 376 g lighter