Browse

Canon EF 400mm F2.8L IS II USM vs Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Canon EF 400mm F2.8L IS II USM is lighter by 1520g.
  • Canon EF 400mm F2.8L IS II USM is the newer design (2011 vs 1999).
Specification comparison
Spec EF 400mm F2.8L IS II USM EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM
Brand Canon Canon
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Prime Telephoto
Focal length 400mm 400mm
Max aperture f/2.8 f/2.8
Released 2011 1999
Blades 9 8
Format full-frame full-frame
Groups 12 13
Af motor USM USM
Elements 16 17
Weight g 3850.0 (lighter) 5370.0
Length mm 343.0 349.0
Stabilized Yes Yes
Diameter mm 163.0 163.0
Min focus m 2.7 (closer focusing) 3.0
Max magnification 0.17 0.15

Canon EF 400mm F2.8L IS II USM

A professional 400mm f/2.8 telephoto with image stabilization and fluorite elements, aimed at sports and wildlife on full-frame EF bodies.

Pros

  • f/2.8 aperture at 400mm
  • Stabilized
  • Fast AF
  • Extender compatible

Cons

  • Heavy (about 3.9 kg)
  • Needs a monopod or gimbal head
  • Large

Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM

The 1999 first stabilized version of Canon's 400mm f/2.8, a staple for pro sports and wildlife shooters. Later II and III models reduced the weight.

Pros

  • f/2.8 aperture with IS
  • Weather-sealed L build
  • Fast USM focusing
  • Takes Canon extenders

Cons

  • About 5.4kg
  • Older IS generation
  • Heavier than the II and III

More comparisons for Canon EF 400mm F2.8L IS II USM

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.