Browse

Canon EF 400mm F2.8L IS II USM vs Canon EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II USM

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Canon EF 400mm F2.8L IS II USM is faster by 1 stop (f/2.8 vs f/4.0), letting in more light.
  • Canon EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II USM is lighter by 1750g.
  • Canon EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II USM is the newer design (2014 vs 2011).
Specification comparison
Spec EF 400mm F2.8L IS II USM EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II USM
Brand Canon Canon
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Prime Telephoto
Focal length 400mm 400mm
Max aperture f/2.8 (faster) f/4.0
Released 2011 2014
Blades 9 9
Format full-frame full-frame
Groups 12 12
Af motor USM USM
Elements 16 18
Weight g 3850.0 2100.0 (lighter)
Length mm 343.0 232.7
Stabilized Yes Yes
Diameter mm 163.0 128.0
Min focus m 2.7 (closer focusing) 3.3
Max magnification 0.17 0.13

Canon EF 400mm F2.8L IS II USM

A professional 400mm f/2.8 telephoto with image stabilization and fluorite elements, aimed at sports and wildlife on full-frame EF bodies.

Pros

  • f/2.8 aperture at 400mm
  • Stabilized
  • Fast AF
  • Extender compatible

Cons

  • Heavy (about 3.9 kg)
  • Needs a monopod or gimbal head
  • Large

Canon EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II USM

The 2014 revision of the diffractive-optics 400mm f/4 with improved flare control. At about 2.1kg it is slightly heavier than the first version.

Pros

  • About 2.1kg
  • IS with panning mode
  • Improved contrast over the first DO
  • Takes Canon extenders

Cons

  • Diffractive optics can show ring patterns in out-of-focus highlights
  • Slightly heavier than the first version

More comparisons for Canon EF 400mm F2.8L IS II USM

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.