Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM vs Tamron AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di-II LD (Model A16)
Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.
Verdict at a glance
- Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM goes wider (16mm vs 17mm).
- Tamron AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di-II LD (Model A16) reaches further (50mm vs 35mm).
| Spec | EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM | AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di-II LD (Model A16) |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canon | Tamron |
| Mount | Canon EF | Canon EF |
| Type | Wide Zoom | Zoom |
| Focal length | 16-35mm (wider) | 17-50mm |
| Max aperture | f/16.0 (faster) | f/17.0 |
| Released | 2014 | n/a |
| Blades | 9 | n/a |
| Format | full-frame | n/a |
| Groups | 12 | n/a |
| Af motor | USM | n/a |
| Elements | 16 | n/a |
| Weight g | 615.0 | n/a |
| Filter mm | 77 | n/a |
| Length mm | 112.8 | n/a |
| Stabilized | Yes | n/a |
| Diameter mm | 82.6 | n/a |
| Min focus m | 0.28 | n/a |
| Max magnification | 0.23 | n/a |
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM
A stabilized wide-angle zoom with a constant f/4 aperture. Smaller and lighter than the f/2.8 versions, with a 77mm filter thread.
Pros
- Image stabilization
- Sharp across the frame
- Lighter than the f/2.8
- 77mm filter thread
Cons
- f/4 limits astrophotography
- Less shallow depth of field
- Not as fast as the f/2.8 versions
Tamron AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di-II LD (Model A16)
Tamron AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di-II LD (Model A16): an APS-C fast standard zoom lens with a 17-50mm focal length and a maximum aperture of f/2.8, made for Canon EF mount cameras. The range covers everything from wide scenes to portraits, so it works as a general-purpose lens.
More comparisons for Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM
- Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM vs Tokina AF 16-28mm f/2.8 AT-X Pro SD FX
- Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM vs Tamron AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di-II LD (Model A16)
- Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM vs Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF)
- Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM vs Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 EX DG HSM