Browse

Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM vs Tamron AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di-II LD (Model A16)

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM goes wider (16mm vs 17mm).
  • Tamron AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di-II LD (Model A16) reaches further (50mm vs 35mm).
Specification comparison
Spec EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di-II LD (Model A16)
Brand Canon Tamron
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Wide Zoom Zoom
Focal length 16-35mm (wider) 17-50mm
Max aperture f/16.0 (faster) f/17.0
Released 2014 n/a
Blades 9 n/a
Format full-frame n/a
Groups 12 n/a
Af motor USM n/a
Elements 16 n/a
Weight g 615.0 n/a
Filter mm 77 n/a
Length mm 112.8 n/a
Stabilized Yes n/a
Diameter mm 82.6 n/a
Min focus m 0.28 n/a
Max magnification 0.23 n/a

Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM

A stabilized wide-angle zoom with a constant f/4 aperture. Smaller and lighter than the f/2.8 versions, with a 77mm filter thread.

Pros

  • Image stabilization
  • Sharp across the frame
  • Lighter than the f/2.8
  • 77mm filter thread

Cons

  • f/4 limits astrophotography
  • Less shallow depth of field
  • Not as fast as the f/2.8 versions

Tamron AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di-II LD (Model A16)

Tamron AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di-II LD (Model A16): an APS-C fast standard zoom lens with a 17-50mm focal length and a maximum aperture of f/2.8, made for Canon EF mount cameras. The range covers everything from wide scenes to portraits, so it works as a general-purpose lens.

More comparisons for Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.