Browse

Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM vs Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM is faster by 2.3 stops (f/16.0 vs f/35.0), letting in more light.
  • Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM is lighter by 280g.
  • Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM goes wider (16mm vs 35mm).
  • Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM is the newer design (2014 vs 2012).
Specification comparison
Spec EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM EF 35mm f/2 IS USM
Brand Canon Canon
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Wide Zoom Prime
Focal length 16-35mm (wider) 35mm
Max aperture f/16.0 (faster) f/35.0
Released 2014 2012
Blades 9 8
Format full-frame full-frame
Groups 12 8
Af motor USM USM
Elements 16 10
Weight g 615.0 335.0 (lighter)
Filter mm 77 67
Length mm 112.8 62.6
Stabilized Yes Yes
Diameter mm 82.6 77.9
Min focus m 0.28 0.24 (closer focusing)
Max magnification 0.23 0.24

Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM

A stabilized wide-angle zoom with a constant f/4 aperture. Smaller and lighter than the f/2.8 versions, with a 77mm filter thread.

Pros

  • Image stabilization
  • Sharp across the frame
  • Lighter than the f/2.8
  • 77mm filter thread

Cons

  • f/4 limits astrophotography
  • Less shallow depth of field
  • Not as fast as the f/2.8 versions

Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM

The EF 35mm f/2 IS USM is a compact wide-normal prime with a hybrid image stabilizer and f/2 aperture. Covers full frame and works on APS-C Canon EF bodies.

Pros

  • Image stabilization
  • Small and light
  • Close minimum focus distance (0.24 m)
  • Quick ring USM focus

Cons

  • f/2 is slower than the f/1.4L
  • Not an L-series build
  • Less background blur than f/1.4

More comparisons for Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.