Browse

Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM vs Tamron AF 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF)

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Tamron AF 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) reaches further (300mm vs 135mm).
Specification comparison
Spec EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM AF 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF)
Brand Canon Tamron
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Superzoom Superzoom
Focal length 28-135mm 28-300mm
Max aperture f/28.0 f/28.0
Released 1998 n/a
Blades 6 n/a
Format full-frame n/a
Groups 12 n/a
Af motor USM n/a
Elements 16 n/a
Weight g 549.0 n/a
Filter mm 72 n/a
Length mm 97.0 n/a
Stabilized Yes n/a
Diameter mm 78.0 n/a
Min focus m 0.5 n/a
Max magnification 0.19 n/a

Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

A mid-range zoom with stabilization and USM focusing. It was a mainstream Canon kit lens for many EOS bodies.

Pros

  • Image stabilization
  • Wide-to-tele range
  • USM focusing

Cons

  • Variable aperture
  • Distortion at the wide end
  • Plain build

Tamron AF 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF)

Tamron AF 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF): a full-frame superzoom lens with a 28-300mm focal length and a maximum aperture of f/3.5-6.3, made for Canon EF mount cameras, with aspherical elements. A high-ratio travel zoom covering wide-angle to telephoto in one lens.

More comparisons for Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.