Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM vs Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM | C
Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.
Verdict at a glance
- Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM | C is faster by 7.6 stops (f/5.0 vs f/70.0), letting in more light.
- Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM goes wider (70mm vs 150mm).
- Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM | C reaches further (600mm vs 200mm).
| Spec | EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM | 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM | C |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canon | Sigma |
| Mount | Canon EF | Canon EF |
| Type | Telephoto Zoom | Telephoto Zoom |
| Focal length | 70-200mm (wider) | 150-600mm |
| Max aperture | f/70.0 | f/5.0 (faster) |
| Released | 2001 | n/a |
| Blades | 8 | n/a |
| Format | full-frame | n/a |
| Groups | 18 | n/a |
| Af motor | USM | n/a |
| Elements | 23 | n/a |
| Weight g | 1590.0 | n/a |
| Filter mm | 77 | n/a |
| Length mm | 197.0 | n/a |
| Stabilized | Yes | n/a |
| Diameter mm | 86.2 | n/a |
| Min focus m | 1.4 | n/a |
| Max magnification | 0.17 | n/a |
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
The first stabilized f/2.8 version of Canon's 70-200mm L telephoto zoom, from 2006. It still delivers professional results on full-frame EF cameras.
Pros
- Constant f/2.8
- Image stabilization
- Dust and moisture resistant L build
Cons
- Softer in the corners than later versions
- Heavy (about 1.6 kg)
- Older IS design
Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM | C
This 150-600mm f/5-6.3 full-frame telephoto zoom lens from Sigma fits Canon EF mount cameras, with Optical Stabilizer and Hyper Sonic Motor autofocus. A long-reach telephoto zoom aimed at sports and wildlife.
More comparisons for Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
- Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM vs Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 LD Macro 1:2
- Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM vs Tamron SP AF 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD (IF) Macro (A001)
- Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM vs Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM | C
- Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM vs Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport