Skip to content
Menu

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM vs Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS Macro HSM

Both are Canon EF lenses. Here is what actually differs.

Pick the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM if

  • Our notes say it suits: Travel and landscape, hiking telephoto, outdoor sports

Pick the Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS Macro HSM if

  • You need ⅓ stop more light for low light or background blur (f/3.5 vs f/4)
  • You want a wider view: 18mm vs 70mm at the wide end
  • You need more reach: 250mm vs 200mm at the long end

Spec differences

16 differences
Specifications that differ between the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM and the Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS Macro HSM
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS Macro HSM
Brand
Canon
Sigma
Type
Telephoto Zoom
Macro
Format
Full frame
not listed
Focal length
70-200mm
18-250mm
Max aperture
f/4
f/3.5 ⅓ stop faster
Weight
760 g
not listed
Length
172 mm
not listed
Diameter
76 mm
not listed
Filter thread
67 mm
not listed
Min focus distance
1.2 m
not listed
Max magnification
0.21×
not listed
Aperture blades
8
not listed
Optical design
20 elements / 15 groups
not listed
Autofocus motor
USM
not listed
Image stabilization
Yes
not listed
Released
2006
not listed
1 identical spec hidden: mount. Show all
Mount
Canon EF both

Our notes

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

A compact, light telephoto zoom with a constant f/4 aperture and stabilization. Popular with travel, landscape and wildlife photographers who watch their weight.

Pros

  • Light and compact for the range
  • Sharp optics
  • Stabilized
  • Dust and water resistant

Cons

  • Slower than f/2.8 versions
  • Blurred backgrounds are harder to achieve

Our notes

Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS Macro HSM

This 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 APS-C macro zoom lens from Sigma fits Canon EF mount cameras, with Optical Stabilizer and Hyper Sonic Motor autofocus. A high-ratio walk-around zoom for APS-C cameras.

More comparisons

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.