Browse

Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM vs Tokina RMC 300mm f/6.3 Mirror

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Tokina RMC 300mm f/6.3 Mirror is faster by 11.1 stops (f/6.3 vs f/300.0), letting in more light.
Specification comparison
Spec EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM RMC 300mm f/6.3 Mirror
Brand Canon Tokina
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Prime Mirror
Focal length 300mm 300mm
Max aperture f/300.0 f/6.3 (faster)
Released 1999 n/a
Blades 8 n/a
Format full-frame n/a
Groups 13 n/a
Af motor USM n/a
Elements 17 n/a
Weight g 2550.0 n/a
Length mm 252.0 n/a
Stabilized Yes n/a
Diameter mm 128.0 n/a
Min focus m 2.5 n/a
Max magnification 0.13 n/a

Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM

The 1999 first version of Canon's stabilized 300mm f/2.8 super-telephoto. It was succeeded by the II in 2010.

Pros

  • f/2.8 aperture with IS
  • Sharp optics
  • Fast ring USM
  • Takes extenders

Cons

  • About 2.5kg
  • Older IS generation than the II
  • Minimum focus of 2.5m

Tokina RMC 300mm f/6.3 Mirror

This 300mm f/6.3 mirror telephoto lens from Tokina fits Canon EF mount cameras. Its catadioptric design keeps a long focal length compact and light.

More comparisons for Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.