Browse

Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR vs Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM goes wider (17mm vs 70mm).
  • Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR reaches further (200mm vs 70mm).
Specification comparison
Spec AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM
Brand Nikon Sigma
Mount Nikon F Nikon F
Type Telephoto Zoom Macro
Focal length 70-200mm 17-70mm (wider)
Max aperture f/2.8 f/2.8
Released 2016 n/a
Format full-frame n/a
Groups 18 n/a
Af motor SWM n/a
Elements 22 n/a
Weight g 1430.0 n/a
Filter mm 77 n/a
Length mm 202.5 n/a
Stabilized Yes n/a
Diameter mm 88.5 n/a
Min focus m 1.1 n/a
Max magnification 0.21 n/a

Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR

A pro telephoto zoom for Nikon FX cameras with fluorite elements, vibration reduction and a lighter build than earlier versions.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8
  • Fluorite elements reduce weight
  • Vibration reduction
  • Fast AF

Cons

  • Heavy (1.43 kg)
  • Large

Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM

Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM: an APS-C macro zoom lens with a 17-70mm focal length and a maximum aperture of f/2.8-4, made for Nikon F mount cameras, with Optical Stabilizer and Hyper Sonic Motor autofocus. It is intended for close-up work with small subjects such as ...

More comparisons for Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.