Browse

Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8 L IS USM vs Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC is faster by 1.3 stops (f/1.8 vs f/2.8), letting in more light.
  • Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8 L IS USM goes wider (15mm vs 17mm).
  • Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC reaches further (40mm vs 35mm).
Specification comparison
Spec RF 15-35mm F2.8 L IS USM 17-40mm f/1.8 DC
Brand Canon Sigma
Mount Canon RF Canon RF
Type Wide Zoom Zoom
Focal length 15-35mm (wider) 17-40mm
Max aperture f/2.8 f/1.8 (faster)
Released 2019 n/a
Blades 9 11
Format full-frame aps-c
Groups 12 11
Af motor USM n/a
Elements 16 17
Weight g 840.0 n/a
Filter mm 82 n/a
Length mm 126.8 n/a
Stabilized Yes n/a
Diameter mm 88.5 n/a
Min focus m 0.28 0.28
Max magnification 0.21 0.21

Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8 L IS USM

A wide-angle zoom for Canon RF full-frame cameras with a constant f/2.8 aperture and image stabilization, for landscape, event and video work.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8
  • Image stabilization
  • Weather-sealed L build
  • Sharp across the frame

Cons

  • Heavy for a wide zoom (840 g)
  • 82mm filter thread
  • Relies on in-camera correction

Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

This 17-40mm f/1.8 APS-C fast wide-angle zoom lens from Sigma fits Canon RF mount cameras. It covers wide angles for landscapes, interiors and architecture.

More comparisons for Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8 L IS USM

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.