Browse

Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro vs Vivitar 105mm f/2.5 Auto

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Vivitar 105mm f/2.5 Auto is faster by 0.3 stops (f/2.5 vs f/2.8), letting in more light.
Specification comparison
Spec 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro 105mm f/2.5 Auto
Brand Sigma Vivitar
Mount Nikon F Nikon F
Type Macro Prime
Focal length 105mm 105mm
Max aperture f/2.8 f/2.5 (faster)
Blades 9 n/a
Format full-frame n/a
Groups 11 n/a
Af motor HSM n/a
Elements 16 n/a
Weight g 725 n/a
Filter mm 62 n/a
Length mm 126.4 n/a
Stabilized Yes n/a
Diameter mm 78.3 n/a
Min focus m 0.312 n/a
Max magnification 1.0 n/a

Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro

A stabilized 1:1 macro for full-frame DSLRs that works equally well as a portrait lens. It weighs about 725 g and has a 62mm filter size.

Pros

  • True 1:1 magnification
  • Optical stabilization
  • HSM autofocus
  • 62mm filters

Cons

  • Older EX design
  • Heavier than non-stabilized macro lenses

Vivitar 105mm f/2.5 Auto

This 105mm f/2.5 short-telephoto prime lens from Vivitar fits Nikon F mount cameras. The focal length is a classic choice for portraits and details.

More comparisons for Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.