Browse

Tamron SP AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Macro vs Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport is faster by 5.3 stops (f/4.5 vs f/28.0), letting in more light.
  • Tamron SP AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Macro goes wider (28mm vs 60mm).
  • Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport reaches further (600mm vs 75mm).
Specification comparison
Spec SP AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Macro 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport
Brand Tamron Sigma
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Macro Superzoom
Focal length 28-75mm (wider) 60-600mm
Max aperture f/28.0 f/4.5 (faster)
Weight g 510 n/a
Length mm 92.0 n/a
Min focus m 0.33 n/a

Tamron SP AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Macro

A compact f/2.8 standard zoom for full-frame DSLRs, weighing about 510 g. It has a minimum focus distance of 0.33 m and was widely used as an alternative to brand-name lenses.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8
  • Light at about 510 g
  • Close focus 0.33 m
  • Full-frame coverage

Cons

  • Autofocus is slower and louder than newer motors
  • No stabilization
  • Older optical design

Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport

A long telephoto zoom from Sigma's Sport line, with Optical Stabilizer and a dust- and splash-proof structure. It covers 60-600mm.

Pros

  • 60-600mm range
  • Optical Stabilizer
  • Dust- and splash-proof structure

Cons

  • Very heavy at roughly 2.7 kg
  • Large

More comparisons for Tamron SP AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Macro

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.