Browse

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR vs Vivitar 75-205mm f/3.8 Auto Tele-Zoom

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Nikon AF-S Nikkor 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR goes wider (28mm vs 75mm).
  • Nikon AF-S Nikkor 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR reaches further (300mm vs 205mm).
Specification comparison
Spec AF-S Nikkor 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR 75-205mm f/3.8 Auto Tele-Zoom
Brand Nikon Vivitar
Mount Nikon F Nikon F
Type Zoom Telephoto Zoom
Focal length 28-300mm (wider) 75-205mm
Max aperture f/3.5 (faster) f/3.8
Released 2010 n/a
Format full-frame n/a
Groups 14 n/a
Af motor SWM n/a
Elements 19 n/a
Weight g 800.0 n/a
Filter mm 77 n/a
Length mm 114.5 n/a
Stabilized Yes n/a
Diameter mm 83.0 n/a
Min focus m 0.5 n/a

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

A 2010 FX superzoom spanning 28-300mm with VR. It trades some image quality for range.

Pros

  • 10.7x zoom
  • VR
  • 77mm filters
  • Compact

Cons

  • Slow aperture
  • Soft at 300mm
  • Distortion at 28mm

Vivitar 75-205mm f/3.8 Auto Tele-Zoom

A 75-205mm f/3.8 telephoto zoom lens, the Vivitar 75-205mm f/3.8 Auto Tele-Zoom is designed for Nikon F mount bodies. The range suits sports, wildlife, events and portraits.

More comparisons for Nikon AF-S Nikkor 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.