Browse

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR vs Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD goes wider (18mm vs 28mm).
  • Nikon AF-S Nikkor 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR reaches further (300mm vs 270mm).
Specification comparison
Spec AF-S Nikkor 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD
Brand Nikon Tamron
Mount Nikon F Nikon F
Type Zoom Zoom
Focal length 28-300mm 18-270mm (wider)
Max aperture f/3.5 f/3.5
Released 2010 n/a
Format full-frame aps-c
Groups 14 n/a
Af motor SWM PZD
Elements 19 n/a
Weight g 800.0 n/a
Filter mm 77 62
Length mm 114.5 n/a
Stabilized Yes Yes
Diameter mm 83.0 n/a
Min focus m 0.5 0.49

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

A 2010 FX superzoom spanning 28-300mm with VR. It trades some image quality for range.

Pros

  • 10.7x zoom
  • VR
  • 77mm filters
  • Compact

Cons

  • Slow aperture
  • Soft at 300mm
  • Distortion at 28mm

Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD

Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD: an APS-C superzoom lens with a 18-270mm focal length and a maximum aperture of f/3.5-6.3, made for Nikon F mount cameras, with Vibration Compensation and quiet motor-driven autofocus. A high-ratio travel zoom covering wide-angle to telep...

More comparisons for Nikon AF-S Nikkor 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.