Browse

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II vs Nikon AF Micro-Nikkor 200mm f/4D IF-ED

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II is faster by 2 stops (f/2.0 vs f/4.0), letting in more light.
  • Nikon AF Micro-Nikkor 200mm f/4D IF-ED is lighter by 1740g.
Specification comparison
Spec AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II AF Micro-Nikkor 200mm f/4D IF-ED
Brand Nikon Nikon
Mount Nikon F Nikon F
Type Prime Macro
Focal length 200mm 200mm
Max aperture f/2.0 (faster) f/4.0
Released n/a 1993
Weight g 2930 1190.0 (lighter)
Filter mm 52 62
Length mm 204.0 193.0
Stabilized Yes n/a
Diameter mm 124.0 76.0
Min focus m 1.9 0.5 (closer focusing)
Format n/a full-frame
Groups n/a 8
Af motor n/a none
Elements n/a 13
Max magnification n/a 1.0

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II

Nikon's revision of Nikon's 200mm f/2, with VR and Nano Crystal Coat, introduced in 2010. It is a large, fast prime.

Pros

  • f/2 aperture
  • VR II
  • Nano Crystal Coat
  • Weather-sealed build

Cons

  • About 2.9kg
  • Large

Nikon AF Micro-Nikkor 200mm f/4D IF-ED

Macro telephoto that reaches 1:1 from a comfortable working distance, introduced in 1993. It has internal focusing and a tripod collar.

Pros

  • 1:1 reproduction
  • Long working distance
  • Internal focusing
  • Tripod collar

Cons

  • Heavy at 1.19kg
  • No VR
  • Slow screw-drive focus

More comparisons for Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.