Browse

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II vs Tamron SP 200mm f/3.5 Adaptall-2

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II is faster by 1.6 stops (f/2.0 vs f/3.5), letting in more light.
  • Tamron SP 200mm f/3.5 Adaptall-2 is lighter by 2390g.
Specification comparison
Spec AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II SP 200mm f/3.5 Adaptall-2
Brand Nikon Tamron
Mount Nikon F Nikon F
Type Prime Telephoto
Focal length 200mm 200mm
Max aperture f/2.0 (faster) f/3.5
Released n/a 1979
Weight g 2930 540 (lighter)
Filter mm 52 58
Length mm 204.0 112.5
Stabilized Yes n/a
Diameter mm 124.0 68.0
Min focus m 1.9 1.7 (closer focusing)
Format n/a full-frame
Groups n/a 5
Af motor n/a none
Elements n/a 5

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II

Nikon's revision of Nikon's 200mm f/2, with VR and Nano Crystal Coat, introduced in 2010. It is a large, fast prime.

Pros

  • f/2 aperture
  • VR II
  • Nano Crystal Coat
  • Weather-sealed build

Cons

  • About 2.9kg
  • Large

Tamron SP 200mm f/3.5 Adaptall-2

A 200mm f/3.5 telephoto prime lens, the Tamron SP 200mm f/3.5 Adaptall-2 is designed for Nikon F mount bodies, from the Tamron SP series. It brings distant subjects closer for sports, wildlife and events.

More comparisons for Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.