Browse

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II vs Vivitar 200mm f/3.5 Auto Telephoto

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II is faster by 1.6 stops (f/2.0 vs f/3.5), letting in more light.
Specification comparison
Spec AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II 200mm f/3.5 Auto Telephoto
Brand Nikon Vivitar
Mount Nikon F Nikon F
Type Prime Telephoto
Focal length 200mm 200mm
Max aperture f/2.0 (faster) f/3.5
Weight g 2930 n/a
Filter mm 52 n/a
Length mm 204.0 n/a
Stabilized Yes n/a
Diameter mm 124.0 n/a
Min focus m 1.9 n/a

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II

Nikon's revision of Nikon's 200mm f/2, with VR and Nano Crystal Coat, introduced in 2010. It is a large, fast prime.

Pros

  • f/2 aperture
  • VR II
  • Nano Crystal Coat
  • Weather-sealed build

Cons

  • About 2.9kg
  • Large

Vivitar 200mm f/3.5 Auto Telephoto

This 200mm f/3.5 telephoto prime lens from Vivitar fits Nikon F mount cameras. It brings distant subjects closer for sports, wildlife and events.

More comparisons for Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.