Browse

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO vs Sigma 56mm F1.4 DC DN | C 018

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Sigma 56mm F1.4 DC DN | C 018 is faster by 2 stops (f/1.4 vs f/2.8), letting in more light.
  • Sigma 56mm F1.4 DC DN | C 018 is lighter by 624g.
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO goes wider (40mm vs 56mm).
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO reaches further (150mm vs 56mm).
Specification comparison
Spec M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO 56mm F1.4 DC DN | C 018
Brand Olympus Sigma
Mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Type Zoom Prime
Focal length 40-150mm (wider) 56mm
Max aperture f/2.8 f/1.4 (faster)
Weight g 880 256 (lighter)
Filter mm 72 55
Length mm 160.0 58.1
Diameter mm 79.0 66.5
Min focus m 0.7 0.5 (closer focusing)
Blades n/a 9
Format n/a aps-c
Groups n/a 6
Af motor n/a Stepping motor
Elements n/a 10
Max magnification n/a 0.14

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO

A weather-sealed 80-300mm-equivalent telephoto zoom for Micro Four Thirds with a constant f/2.8 aperture. It weighs about 880 g, takes 72mm filters and supports Olympus teleconverters.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8
  • Weather-sealed build
  • Teleconverter support
  • Manual-focus clutch

Cons

  • Not stabilized itself
  • Heavier than other MFT lenses

Sigma 56mm F1.4 DC DN | C 018

A fast portrait prime for Micro Four Thirds, weighing about 256 g. It takes 55mm filters and focuses as close as 0.5 m.

Pros

  • f/1.4 aperture
  • Light at 256 g
  • Stepping motor AF
  • Sharp

Cons

  • Not weather sealed
  • No stabilization
  • Narrow field (112mm equivalent) for indoors

More comparisons for Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.