Browse

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro vs Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro is lighter by 498g.
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro goes wider (12mm vs 40mm).
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO reaches further (150mm vs 40mm).
Specification comparison
Spec M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO
Brand Olympus Olympus
Mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Type Zoom Zoom
Focal length 12-40mm (wider) 40-150mm
Max aperture f/2.8 f/2.8
Weight g 382 (lighter) 880
Filter mm 62 72
Length mm 84.0 160.0
Diameter mm 70.0 79.0
Min focus m 0.2 (closer focusing) 0.7

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro

Olympus's weather-sealed 24-80mm-equivalent standard zoom for Micro Four Thirds with a constant f/2.8 aperture. It weighs about 382 g and takes 62mm filters.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8
  • Dust, splash and freeze resistant build
  • Manual-focus clutch ring
  • Compact and light for an f/2.8 zoom

Cons

  • No built-in stabilization (relies on the camera)
  • Larger than the f/4 12-100mm alternatives

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO

A weather-sealed 80-300mm-equivalent telephoto zoom for Micro Four Thirds with a constant f/2.8 aperture. It weighs about 880 g, takes 72mm filters and supports Olympus teleconverters.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8
  • Weather-sealed build
  • Teleconverter support
  • Manual-focus clutch

Cons

  • Not stabilized itself
  • Heavier than other MFT lenses

More comparisons for Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.