Browse

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro vs Tamron 14-150mm f/3.5-5.8 Di III

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro is faster by 0.6 stops (f/2.8 vs f/3.5), letting in more light.
  • Tamron 14-150mm f/3.5-5.8 Di III is lighter by 97g.
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro goes wider (12mm vs 14mm).
  • Tamron 14-150mm f/3.5-5.8 Di III reaches further (150mm vs 40mm).
Specification comparison
Spec M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro 14-150mm f/3.5-5.8 Di III
Brand Olympus Tamron
Mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Type Zoom Zoom
Focal length 12-40mm (wider) 14-150mm
Max aperture f/2.8 (faster) f/3.5
Weight g 382 285 (lighter)
Filter mm 62 52
Length mm 84.0 80.0
Diameter mm 70.0 64.0
Min focus m 0.2 (closer focusing) 0.5
Format n/a full-frame

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro

Olympus's weather-sealed 24-80mm-equivalent standard zoom for Micro Four Thirds with a constant f/2.8 aperture. It weighs about 382 g and takes 62mm filters.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8
  • Dust, splash and freeze resistant build
  • Manual-focus clutch ring
  • Compact and light for an f/2.8 zoom

Cons

  • No built-in stabilization (relies on the camera)
  • Larger than the f/4 12-100mm alternatives

Tamron 14-150mm f/3.5-5.8 Di III

A 14-150mm f/3.5-5.8 full-frame superzoom lens, the Tamron 14-150mm f/3.5-5.8 Di III is designed for Micro Four Thirds mount bodies. The wide-to-tele range makes it a one-lens option for travel and everyday shooting.

More comparisons for Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.