Browse

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro vs Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro is faster by 0.6 stops (f/2.8 vs f/3.5), letting in more light.
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ is lighter by 171g.
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ reaches further (50mm vs 40mm).
Specification comparison
Spec M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ
Brand Olympus Olympus
Mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Type Zoom Zoom
Focal length 12-40mm 12-50mm
Max aperture f/2.8 (faster) f/3.5
Weight g 382 211 (lighter)
Filter mm 62 52
Length mm 84.0 83.0
Diameter mm 70.0 57.0
Min focus m 0.2 0.2

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro

Olympus's weather-sealed 24-80mm-equivalent standard zoom for Micro Four Thirds with a constant f/2.8 aperture. It weighs about 382 g and takes 62mm filters.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8
  • Dust, splash and freeze resistant build
  • Manual-focus clutch ring
  • Compact and light for an f/2.8 zoom

Cons

  • No built-in stabilization (relies on the camera)
  • Larger than the f/4 12-100mm alternatives

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ

A weather-resistant power-zoom lens for Micro Four Thirds with a macro mode. It weighs about 211 g, takes 52mm filters and covers 24-100mm in full-frame terms.

Pros

  • Dust and splash resistant
  • Electronic zoom lever
  • Macro mode
  • Light at 211 g

Cons

  • Slow aperture
  • Image quality below Pro lenses
  • Electronic zoom speed is coarse

More comparisons for Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.