TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs f/1.4
Both are Leica M prime lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the f/0.95 if
- You need 1 stop more light for low light or background blur (f/0.95 vs f/1.4)
- You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 14 aperture blades vs 12
Pick the f/1.4 if
- You want the lighter lens to carry: 258 g lighter (429 g vs 687 g)
Spec differences
5 differences| f/0.95 | f/1.4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Max aperture |
f/0.95
1 stop faster
|
f/1.4
|
| Weight |
687 g
|
429 g
lighter
|
| Filter thread |
62 mm
|
49 mm
|
| Aperture blades |
14
more blades
|
12
|
| Optical design |
11 elements / 8 groups
|
10 elements / 8 groups
|
8 identical specs hidden: brand, mount, type, format, focal length, min focus distance, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Brand
- TTArtisan both
- Mount
- Leica M both
- Type
- Prime both
- Format
- Full frame both
- Focal length
- 50mm both
- Min focus distance
- 0.7 m both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1 Aspherical
focuses closer vs 203 g lighter
TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 vs Zeiss C Sonnar T* 50mm f/1.5 ZM
focuses closer vs 179 g lighter
TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1.2 Aspherical II
⅔ stop faster vs 365 g lighter
TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 vs Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 50mm F1.5 Aspherical II
TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Zeiss C Sonnar T* 50mm f/1.5 ZM
1⅓ stops faster vs 437 g lighter
TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 vs Voigtlander Heliar Classic 50mm F1.5
more blades vs 174 g lighter