TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 50mm F1.5 Aspherical II
Both are Leica M prime lenses. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 if
- You need 1⅓ stops more light for low light or background blur (f/0.95 vs f/1.5)
- You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 14 aperture blades vs 12
Pick the Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 50mm F1.5 Aspherical II if
Our spec data shows no clear advantage for this lens.
Spec differences
9 differences| TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 | Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 50mm F1.5 Aspherical II | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
TTArtisan
|
Voigtlander
|
| Format |
Full frame
|
not listed
|
| Max aperture |
f/0.95
1⅓ stops faster
|
f/1.5
|
| Weight |
687 g
|
not listed
|
| Length |
not listed
|
36.9 mm
|
| Diameter |
not listed
|
55.3 mm
|
| Filter thread |
62 mm
|
43 mm
|
| Aperture blades |
14
more blades
|
12
|
| Optical design |
11 elements / 8 groups
|
8 elements / 7 groups
|
6 identical specs hidden: mount, type, focal length, min focus distance, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Leica M both
- Type
- Prime both
- Focal length
- 50mm both
- Min focus distance
- 0.7 m both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1 Aspherical
focuses closer vs 203 g lighter
Zeiss C Sonnar T* 50mm f/1.5 ZM vs Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 50mm F1.5 Aspherical II
Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 50mm F1.5 Aspherical II: focuses closer, shorter
TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1.2 Aspherical II
⅔ stop faster vs 365 g lighter
TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 vs Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 50mm F1.5 Aspherical II
TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Zeiss C Sonnar T* 50mm f/1.5 ZM
1⅓ stops faster vs 437 g lighter
Zeiss Planar T* 50mm f/2 ZM vs Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 50mm F1.5 Aspherical II
Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 50mm F1.5 Aspherical II: ⅔ stop faster, shorter