TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 50mm F2 Aspherical
Both are Leica M prime lenses. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 if
- You need 2 stops more light for low light or background blur (f/0.95 vs f/2)
- You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 14 aperture blades vs 12
Pick the Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 50mm F2 Aspherical if
- You want the lighter lens to carry: 399 g lighter (288 g vs 687 g)
Spec differences
9 differences| TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 | Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 50mm F2 Aspherical | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
TTArtisan
|
Voigtlander
|
| Format |
Full frame
|
not listed
|
| Max aperture |
f/0.95
2 stops faster
|
f/2
|
| Weight |
687 g
|
288 g
lighter
|
| Length |
not listed
|
53 mm
|
| Diameter |
not listed
|
55.6 mm
|
| Filter thread |
62 mm
|
49 mm
|
| Aperture blades |
14
more blades
|
12
|
| Optical design |
11 elements / 8 groups
|
10 elements / 8 groups
|
6 identical specs hidden: mount, type, focal length, min focus distance, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Leica M both
- Type
- Prime both
- Focal length
- 50mm both
- Min focus distance
- 0.7 m both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1 Aspherical
focuses closer vs 203 g lighter
Zeiss Planar T* 50mm f/2 ZM vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 50mm F2 Aspherical
58 g lighter vs shorter
TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Voigtlander Nokton 50mm F1.2 Aspherical II
⅔ stop faster vs 365 g lighter
Zeiss C Sonnar T* 50mm f/1.5 ZM vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 50mm F2 Aspherical
⅔ stop faster vs focuses closer
TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs Zeiss C Sonnar T* 50mm f/1.5 ZM
1⅓ stops faster vs 437 g lighter
TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 50mm F2 Aspherical
1 stop faster vs 141 g lighter