Skip to content
Menu

Nikon Nikkor Z 120-300mm F2.8 TC VR S vs Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary

Both are Nikon Z lenses. Here is what actually differs.

Pick the Nikon Nikkor Z 120-300mm F2.8 TC VR S if

  • You need ⅔ stop more light for low light or background blur (f/2.8 vs f/3.5)
  • You shoot full frame: the Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary is made for APS-C
  • You prefer a newer design: released 2026 vs 2025

Pick the Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary if

  • You want the lighter lens to carry: 2105 g lighter (630 g vs 2735 g)
  • You want a wider view: 16mm vs 120mm at the wide end
  • You want bigger close-ups: 0.5× vs 0.18× maximum magnification
  • You want a compact lens: 125.4 mm vs 353.5 mm long

Spec differences

16 differences
Specifications that differ between the Nikon Nikkor Z 120-300mm F2.8 TC VR S and the Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary
Nikon Nikkor Z 120-300mm F2.8 TC VR S Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary
Brand
Nikon
Sigma
Type
Telephoto Zoom
Superzoom
Format
Full frame
APS-C
Focal length
120-300mm
16-300mm
Max aperture
f/2.8 ⅔ stop faster
f/3.5
Weight
2735 g
630 g lighter
Length
353.5 mm
125.4 mm shorter
Diameter
128 mm
73.8 mm slimmer
Filter thread
112 mm
67 mm
Min focus distance
0.98 m
not listed
Max magnification
0.18×
0.5× larger
Aperture blades
not listed
9
Optical design
30 elements / 24 groups
20 elements / 14 groups
Autofocus motor
not listed
Linear motor
Weather sealing
not listed
Yes
Released
2026
2025
2 identical specs hidden: mount, image stabilization. Show all
Mount
Nikon Z both
Image stabilization
Yes both

More comparisons

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.